Case study

Effects of Varying Messaging Signs

A study on how wording on varying messaging signs can affect drivers’ behaviour.

Do you need more info? Not sure how any of this works?
Talk to usMore details

Background

A company wanted to see if the varying messaging signs (VMS) they used had an effect on driver behaviour. To do so, they would need to be able to see car movement before, during, and after every time the signs change. The messages compared were “breakdown ahead” and “crash ahead”.

Solution

By using connected vehicle data, car movement could be analysed. This included speed, g-force, braking and accelerating. The company found that wording did have an effect on drivers with “crash ahead” having effects on speeds while “breakdown ahead” had barely any.

Results

The data shows that “crash ahead” was more effective on drivers than “breakdown ahead”. The average, median, and 85th percentile speed all dropped during the activation of “crash ahead”. “Breakdown ahead” was found to have no effect and in some cases, cars would speed up or drive at faster speeds.
No items found.

More use cases

An image of Origin-Destination trips by freight trucks in Brisbane.

Origin-destination: freight vehicles across QLD

See more +
A map image from Compass' Brakepoint app of Fulham Road, Townsville.

Local traffic management: cones or concrete?

See more +
Varying messaging sign used on a road.

Effects of certain Varying Messaging Signs

See more +
A map of Woronora Road Bridge.

Identifying chokepoints on Heathcote Road Bridge

See more +
Map image of Cahill Expressway.

Is the M7 dangerous?
Identifying spillback on freeways

See more +
Image of a train level crossing in Ben Bullen.

Identifying potentially unsafe train level crossings

See more +

Have more questions?

Check out our more detailed product FAQ page or...

Talk to us

Road insights at your fingertips.

Remove frustration and complexity from your transport projects.
Talk to us